Global Intelligence ​Trust
Menu

Estimating the Impact of Russian PMCs on the War in Syria

9/2/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
Reports of Russian mercenaries fighting on the ground in Syria have resurfaced, raising further questions about the involvement of Russia in the war between the Assad government and various factions of rebels. Since 2013, Russian private military companies (PMCs) have operated in Syria alongside the Spetsnaz, Russia’s premier special operations units, to support the Syrian regime in ground fighting. Most notably, the Slavonic Corps, a PMC made up of former Russian special forces, was hired by the Syrian government to protect its assets and natural resources from rebel fighters. Although the presence of military contractors likely will not heavily impact the course of the civil war, it does provide some insight into Russia’s commitment to Syria and larger geostrategic vision.
 
The latest reports of Russian involvement in Syria with PMCs follow increased airstrikes on rebel forces in Aleppo, some of which were conducted from an Iranian air base. It is unclear whether or not the reappearance of Russian ground fighters in conjunction with the elevated airstrikes represent a broader Russian effort to defend the Assad regime. Just as the Slavonic Corps protected Syrian resources on the ground, Russia’s general commitment to its ally corresponds with the federation’s financial interests. An increase in cooperation between rebel groups comprising the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), such as Kurdish and Arab militias, may have compelled the Syrian and Russian governments to increase retaliation efforts. As the amount of territory held by the Islamic State in Iraq in the Levant (ISIL) has decreased significantly, the regime’s allies may have ramped up attacks to further degrade the terrorist organization. In addition to supporting its ally in the region, Russia is motivated by the presence of up to 200 Russian citizens participating as foreign fighters in support of ISIL in Syria. Just as the European states from which a vast number of foreign fighters hail have increased efforts to prevent domestic attacks from returning militants, Russia considers radical Islamic terrorism, mainly from Chechen Russians, to be a high priority.
 
American and coalition involvement in the conflict continues to weigh heavily on halting the growth of ISIL rather than the success of rebel forces against the Assad regime. Although Washington has been irked by Russia’s targeting of American-backed rebels, it is unlikely that America will increase participation in the war in direct response to the presence of Russian ground forces. Unless a deal is negotiated, despite dwindling efforts by Secretary Kerry and Foreign Minister Lavrov, the United States will likely restrict its operations to limited airstrikes and covert activities on the ground.
 
Just as they are being employed in Syria, Russian PMCs may have a future as an important tool for the Kremlin in its increasingly active foreign policy. Laws to legalize military contractors have previously been proposed and rejected by the Russian Duma. Russian President Vladimir Putin, however, suggested in 2011 that mercenaries could function as an effective tool of achieving foreign policy goals without direct Russian involvement. Public opinion on their use tends to vary. According to one study, 78% of respondents did not support the deployment of Russian PMCs. Currently, Russia finds itself operating—officially or not—in two major foreign conflicts, namely, the Syrian Civil War and the conflict in the Donbass region of Ukraine. Given the struggling Russian economy, deploying PMCs to accomplish covert military operations could offset high national security costs. There are, however, ethical questions to consider in the growth of a private military sector. Although effective, the conduct of military contractors in war zones has been scrutinized in the past, most notably during the Iraq War. And as suggested in Russian opinion polls, military contractors tend to lack public support given their prioritization of financial benefits over patriotism.

(1) "FSB Worried About Russian Fighters in Syria." The Moscow Times. N.p., 17 May 2013. Web.

 
(2) Isenberg, David. "From Russia, With War." Lobe Log. N.p., 17 Mar. 2016. Web.
 
(3) Galeotti, Mark. "Moscow's Mercenaries in Syria." War on the Rocks. N.p., 5 Apr. 2016. Web.
​
Image: © Olegkozyrev | Dreamstime.com - Protest the Syrian Diaspora against Russia\'s support of Assad's regime
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Picture

    Matthew Hinson

    Archives

    By Month:

    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016

    Categories

    By Topic:

    All

    RSS Feed

    RSS Feed

Services

Intelligence
Commentary
Stocks

Company

About
​
Team

Support

Contact
Terms of Use
All content © 2015 - 2018 Global Intelligence Trust, LLC. All rights reserved.
​○ 10940 Wilshire Blvd Suite 600 Los Angeles, California 90024, USA ○
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Openings
  • Intelligence
    • National >
      • Iran
      • Israel
      • Lebanon
      • Russia
      • Syria
    • Transnational >
      • Commercial Industry >
        • Agriculture
        • Communications and Computers
        • Energy
        • Finance
        • Minerals
        • Transportation
      • Conventional Weapons
      • Defense Industry >
        • Defense Comm
      • Environmental >
        • Innovations
        • Security
      • Finance and Markets >
        • Economics
        • Trade and International Business
      • Geopolitics and Risk >
        • Africa
        • Europe
      • Health >
        • Health and Security
        • Innovations
      • Missile Defense >
        • Missile Def Comm
      • Narcotics >
        • Narcotics Comm
      • Weapons of Mass Destruction >
        • Chemical Weapons
        • Biological Weapons
        • Radiological Weapons
        • Nuclear Weapons
    • Frontier >
      • Arctic >
        • Security
        • Resources
      • Cyber >
        • Civilian Cyber Threats/Uses
        • State/Military Cyber Threats/Uses
      • Space >
        • Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance (ISR)
        • Access
        • Weapons
  • Specialist Commentary
    • By Author
  • Stock Center
    • Interactive Charts >
      • Aerospace-Defense
      • Construction Services
      • Cyber
      • Energy
      • Info-Comm Tech (ICT)
      • Manufacturing
      • Waste Management
    • Market Data
  • Team
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Openings
  • Intelligence
    • National >
      • Iran
      • Israel
      • Lebanon
      • Russia
      • Syria
    • Transnational >
      • Commercial Industry >
        • Agriculture
        • Communications and Computers
        • Energy
        • Finance
        • Minerals
        • Transportation
      • Conventional Weapons
      • Defense Industry >
        • Defense Comm
      • Environmental >
        • Innovations
        • Security
      • Finance and Markets >
        • Economics
        • Trade and International Business
      • Geopolitics and Risk >
        • Africa
        • Europe
      • Health >
        • Health and Security
        • Innovations
      • Missile Defense >
        • Missile Def Comm
      • Narcotics >
        • Narcotics Comm
      • Weapons of Mass Destruction >
        • Chemical Weapons
        • Biological Weapons
        • Radiological Weapons
        • Nuclear Weapons
    • Frontier >
      • Arctic >
        • Security
        • Resources
      • Cyber >
        • Civilian Cyber Threats/Uses
        • State/Military Cyber Threats/Uses
      • Space >
        • Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance (ISR)
        • Access
        • Weapons
  • Specialist Commentary
    • By Author
  • Stock Center
    • Interactive Charts >
      • Aerospace-Defense
      • Construction Services
      • Cyber
      • Energy
      • Info-Comm Tech (ICT)
      • Manufacturing
      • Waste Management
    • Market Data
  • Team